Skip to main content

Is there an emotional brain? (arguments against)


The limbic system has been commonly referred to in scientific literature as the emotional brain. But we know now with more information and advanced technologies that the limbic system is an ambiguous concept, it is what LeDoux says is just a “useful anatomical shorthand”.

One evidence that challenges this theory is that areas that are considered unique to mammals (therefore termed the “mammalian brain”) is also present in ‘primitive’ creatures such as reptiles and amphibians. For example, a study conducted by Gilles Laurent and colleagues in 2018 using single cell RNA-sequencing technology showed that the neurons of the pallium of reptiles had similar genetic makeup to that of the hippocampus and amygdala of mouse and humans! These areas are what MacLean included in the limbic system theory, yet they are present in these ‘lower’ animals. Moreover, the same study showed that the anterior dorsal cortex of the pallium in reptiles was similar to the human neocortex, which is a layer that covers the limbic system and thought to have only existed in ‘higher’ mammals. This goes to show that since animals have different selective pressures, no single group can be thought of as representing the ancestral form of another.

Another piece of evidence is that there are other areas of the brain involved in what we consider as emotion. We see in recent emotion studies that emotion is not localized and is multifaceted. For example, in the famous patient S.M., we see that bilateral damage to her amygdala (limbic area) caused an isolated fear deficit, without involvement in other emotions. Moreover, although S.M. did not recognize fearful faces unless she was told to adjust her gaze to look at the eyes of the subject. Eye gaze is thought to involve various areas such as the inferior temporal lobe and superior temporal sulcus, areas not involved in the limbic system.
Other brain areas have connections to the limbic system and are involved in emotion. These include the hypothalamus that regulates physiological responses and the insular cortex for interoception, a hot topic for emotion researchers in studying the regulation of mood and overall body state.

Moreover, there are areas included in the limbic system that are not specific to emotional reaction. Although the hippocampus is involved in emotional associative learning, it is also involved in declarative memory, explicit memory that does not necessarily involve emotion.

Therefore, it could be suggested that calling the limbic system the ‘emotional brain’ would be misinterpreting the function of these brain regions, as well as oversimplifying the complexity of emotional reactions. As Lisa Feldman Barrett states in her book How Emotion is Made, emotion is a whole-brain process and localizing it to specific regions such as the limbic system is limiting our full understanding of these complex processes.

LeDoux – The Emotional Brain
Gazzaniga, Ivry, Mangun- Cognitive Neuroscience (5th Ed.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

theories on brain localization

There are three major theories on how the brain is organized, in terms of its structure and function. Phrenology was proposed by Gall in the late 18th century who thought it was possible to determine character traits by examining the external bumps on the head. All behavior/mental function was assigned a location in the brain, and using more or less of these regions determined these bumps. The aggregate field view was raised by Flourens (1920s) using experimental evidence that showed that all areas are important for each mental function. So any part can perform all functions and there was no localization. Cellular connectionism (supported by Hughlings Jackson, Wernicke, Sherrington, Ramon y Cajal) states that individual neurons are signalling units that are arranged in groups, each having a particular function. References  E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, T. Jessell, Principles of Neural Science (McGraw-Hill, New York, ed. 4, 2000).

Instead of waiting

We’ve all heard so many affirmations like everything will be okay. It’ll all get better eventually. The light at the end of the tunnel. Just hang in there. All of these reassurances are based off of the present reality not being what you want it to be. The assumption that you are not satisfied with what is happening in your life right now. That you have to go through some kind of suffering, a debt, to achieve that something you want. On the surface, this may be true. Nothing ever truly worth it comes easy. You are never given a one-way ticket to success. And sometimes facing that reality is what a lot of people struggle with when achieving their goals. And the light at the end of the tunnel is supposed to be some kind of motivation, knowing that things will get better once we get passed this suffering. As if every struggle in itself will dissipate once you’ve attained that one thing you are working towards. But personally I feel like that puts so much burden on every day life...