Skip to main content

Is there an emotional brain? (arguments against)


The limbic system has been commonly referred to in scientific literature as the emotional brain. But we know now with more information and advanced technologies that the limbic system is an ambiguous concept, it is what LeDoux says is just a “useful anatomical shorthand”.

One evidence that challenges this theory is that areas that are considered unique to mammals (therefore termed the “mammalian brain”) is also present in ‘primitive’ creatures such as reptiles and amphibians. For example, a study conducted by Gilles Laurent and colleagues in 2018 using single cell RNA-sequencing technology showed that the neurons of the pallium of reptiles had similar genetic makeup to that of the hippocampus and amygdala of mouse and humans! These areas are what MacLean included in the limbic system theory, yet they are present in these ‘lower’ animals. Moreover, the same study showed that the anterior dorsal cortex of the pallium in reptiles was similar to the human neocortex, which is a layer that covers the limbic system and thought to have only existed in ‘higher’ mammals. This goes to show that since animals have different selective pressures, no single group can be thought of as representing the ancestral form of another.

Another piece of evidence is that there are other areas of the brain involved in what we consider as emotion. We see in recent emotion studies that emotion is not localized and is multifaceted. For example, in the famous patient S.M., we see that bilateral damage to her amygdala (limbic area) caused an isolated fear deficit, without involvement in other emotions. Moreover, although S.M. did not recognize fearful faces unless she was told to adjust her gaze to look at the eyes of the subject. Eye gaze is thought to involve various areas such as the inferior temporal lobe and superior temporal sulcus, areas not involved in the limbic system.
Other brain areas have connections to the limbic system and are involved in emotion. These include the hypothalamus that regulates physiological responses and the insular cortex for interoception, a hot topic for emotion researchers in studying the regulation of mood and overall body state.

Moreover, there are areas included in the limbic system that are not specific to emotional reaction. Although the hippocampus is involved in emotional associative learning, it is also involved in declarative memory, explicit memory that does not necessarily involve emotion.

Therefore, it could be suggested that calling the limbic system the ‘emotional brain’ would be misinterpreting the function of these brain regions, as well as oversimplifying the complexity of emotional reactions. As Lisa Feldman Barrett states in her book How Emotion is Made, emotion is a whole-brain process and localizing it to specific regions such as the limbic system is limiting our full understanding of these complex processes.

LeDoux – The Emotional Brain
Gazzaniga, Ivry, Mangun- Cognitive Neuroscience (5th Ed.)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there an emotional brain? Pt.1(intro)

Is there an emotional brain? As much as we like simplicity in models of science, and the locationist view makes things easier for us to understand, research points to the answer that emotions are not localized to one specific brain region or circuit.  The limbic system hypothesis was put forth by Paul MacLean in the 1950s (although some theories led up to this prior such as the Papez circuit). It divides the more deeply fundamental structures with those that are thought to have developed further on in evolution, in ‘higher’ mammals. The limbic system is one component of the triune brain theory that divides the brain up into the neocortex, mammalian brain and reptilian brain. The reptilian brain is proposed to be in charge of responses for survival such as breathing and heart rate. The reptilian brain is called so due to its structures being found also in reptiles. The limbic system is thought to have developed later in evolution and is commonly thought to be the mammalian bra...

What if everything that we do is just a result of biological processes?

Every thought that we have, every emotion that we feel. In the moment, it might seem like such huge impacts to our lives, when in reality every reaction that we have to anything is a reaction to our specific circumstances, and we react to things the way that we were wired to react (destiny?), reactions that will ensure survival whether that be social, physical or mental. We humans think of our selves as these intelligent beings that are no where near as primitive as other animals or plants. However, taking into account natural selection and evolution, we are simply results of various adaptations over history. The system that we use; businesses, economics, society, education etc, all these concepts at a glance seem to isolate us from other animals making us feel special. However, if we think of ourselves as mere biological beings, these social constructs can appear redundant. All of the things that we create and all the problems we seem to worry about appear small. And every sin...

utopia

heres a thought. what if we were all able to freely explore this life being completely aware of the processes occurring to us. And passively observing things that are not apparently within our control. If we observe life flexibly, knowing the cause and effect of the general idea of things. Everything will lose serious meaning. A fight with your friend. But both of you are aware that this anger stems from irrational self protection or lack of ability to accept an alternative option. This level of self-awareness will allow us to not only forgive ourselves for the things that we experience but be able to consciously alter our responses to things. Our world is so distracted in the surviving part. Just passing by. Just paying the rent. Just finding work. Even things that appear to be free are not. Passion is masked by want to succeed. Authenticity masked by the people we are meant to be. Ambition is thought to be admirable in western culture, why? Selflessness is thought to be ...