Skip to main content

'Life's aim is an act not a thought,'

I tend to fail to live by this  quote.

So many thoughts rushing through me at million miles an hour, i feel like i have to catch it all the time. To the point that I don't ever execute an action based on these thoughts.

Planning repeatedly, inside my head and outside of it.
Planning a course of action, thinking of all possible scenarios. 

But this isn't authentic living, I feel like.
As discussed in this quote and the book I'm reading (The Consciousness Instinct by Michael Gazzaniga), it is not thoughts that bring food to the table or that get that task done. It is the physical movement of muscles. It is not thoughts that allow the exploration of art, music and the likes. It is the movements of picking up that pen, that paintbrush, that guitar and physical making something out of it.

Of course I find a lot of value in manifestation and visualization. It's important to set straight what it is you want to do...
But a task for myself, just forget that vision once in a while,
and execute. 

Because things may not go in the direction you want to at times,
and visualizing the desired outcome isn't going to make you feel any better about it. Nor is mulling it over in your brain.
Visualizing is just a faint reference point, your north star, your compass.
It is not the mountains, nor is it the boots you need to walk that mountain, it is not the effort you put into even buying those boots.

So it really comes down to manifesting the future, executing what it is required, reflecting once in a while, but also trusting that your gut instinct will lead to where you need to be.

Sometimes it is my own thoughts that are the source of suffering and my actions and absorbance in a project that gives me the most joy.
All it takes is overcoming the fear and getting out of the comfort zone and living in the action space rather than in a head space.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

on empathy & kindness

 i've learnt so much about empathy and kindness and love these past few months  i always expected another person to show love for me,  before i can give it to them.  and if they did show love from the start, i always thought there wasnt a reason to. that they were just desperate, or being crazy, irrational.  but if we all think like that, no one will ever take a step forward  (luckily not everyone is like this, and we can heal eachother) i ran away from people that showed me love but i also never gave people that love either  we should be kind to people, as they are  without expecting reward or praise or something back from them.  if they are willing to accept that, then good if not, then such energies should be attributed elsewhere (you can't pour tea into a close pot) if they return that love, we should accept it and not question it (when someone opens the door for us, do we question why they're doing it? no) no matter how bad his bad habit...

arguing

I'm just so sick of arguing with people It's not a good feeling when you are both yelling at each other to prove a point And to be quite honest, its not worth it I used to gain so much joy from these things Thinking it was discussion and evolving or something Maybe intellectually we were getting somewhere But spiritually, emotionally, it was all degrading Speaking over each other Making the other person feel uncomfortable Experiencing that first hand and realizing that you never ever Want to make the other person feel the way that you did. When things come from the intention of empathy and mutual love, This is when things actually grow Not when you’re creating walls of opinions But when you connect through shared differences And acknowledgement of this diversity This is where true evolution happens

theories on brain localization

There are three major theories on how the brain is organized, in terms of its structure and function. Phrenology was proposed by Gall in the late 18th century who thought it was possible to determine character traits by examining the external bumps on the head. All behavior/mental function was assigned a location in the brain, and using more or less of these regions determined these bumps. The aggregate field view was raised by Flourens (1920s) using experimental evidence that showed that all areas are important for each mental function. So any part can perform all functions and there was no localization. Cellular connectionism (supported by Hughlings Jackson, Wernicke, Sherrington, Ramon y Cajal) states that individual neurons are signalling units that are arranged in groups, each having a particular function. References  E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, T. Jessell, Principles of Neural Science (McGraw-Hill, New York, ed. 4, 2000).