Skip to main content

'Life's aim is an act not a thought,'

I tend to fail to live by this  quote.

So many thoughts rushing through me at million miles an hour, i feel like i have to catch it all the time. To the point that I don't ever execute an action based on these thoughts.

Planning repeatedly, inside my head and outside of it.
Planning a course of action, thinking of all possible scenarios. 

But this isn't authentic living, I feel like.
As discussed in this quote and the book I'm reading (The Consciousness Instinct by Michael Gazzaniga), it is not thoughts that bring food to the table or that get that task done. It is the physical movement of muscles. It is not thoughts that allow the exploration of art, music and the likes. It is the movements of picking up that pen, that paintbrush, that guitar and physical making something out of it.

Of course I find a lot of value in manifestation and visualization. It's important to set straight what it is you want to do...
But a task for myself, just forget that vision once in a while,
and execute. 

Because things may not go in the direction you want to at times,
and visualizing the desired outcome isn't going to make you feel any better about it. Nor is mulling it over in your brain.
Visualizing is just a faint reference point, your north star, your compass.
It is not the mountains, nor is it the boots you need to walk that mountain, it is not the effort you put into even buying those boots.

So it really comes down to manifesting the future, executing what it is required, reflecting once in a while, but also trusting that your gut instinct will lead to where you need to be.

Sometimes it is my own thoughts that are the source of suffering and my actions and absorbance in a project that gives me the most joy.
All it takes is overcoming the fear and getting out of the comfort zone and living in the action space rather than in a head space.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there an emotional brain? Pt.1(intro)

Is there an emotional brain? As much as we like simplicity in models of science, and the locationist view makes things easier for us to understand, research points to the answer that emotions are not localized to one specific brain region or circuit.  The limbic system hypothesis was put forth by Paul MacLean in the 1950s (although some theories led up to this prior such as the Papez circuit). It divides the more deeply fundamental structures with those that are thought to have developed further on in evolution, in ‘higher’ mammals. The limbic system is one component of the triune brain theory that divides the brain up into the neocortex, mammalian brain and reptilian brain. The reptilian brain is proposed to be in charge of responses for survival such as breathing and heart rate. The reptilian brain is called so due to its structures being found also in reptiles. The limbic system is thought to have developed later in evolution and is commonly thought to be the mammalian brain.

history

Sometimes I think to myself whether all of what we are searching for, will be frowned upon in the future, will be laughed at for all of our efforts As this may be some kind of crazy movement created by delusional people. But this shouldn't stunt us from the curiosities and the explorations within the world we are in now. Some beliefs in the past may seem crazy to us now... but this is just humans trying to explain the world from what they see, from the information that we have. And that is the hesitance that comes from scientists making a statement definitive. Because all of this 'truth' may not be so when future explorers look back at our work, But knowing that the reason they stand in their 'developed' position is because we did exploring for   them, into uncertain waters that are clear as ever to them in their present moment.

its like

i have voices inside my head but then i have a consciousness over that voice inside my head that tells me that these are just voices inside my head. its tiring