Skip to main content

Selfishness

Ah, another demon inside me. A quite rather complicated one.

The social trend of 'self-care' focuses on self and putting yourself first. People, especially young people, are so affected by the opinions and values of people around them that they lose touch of their authentic self--what makes that individual unique, what they want to change in the world, what they truly want from this journey of life. There is a certain magical quality in looking within yourself what you sought to find in others' validation or external circumstances. It's learning to face that uncertainty, learning that it's okay, and digging deeper to find those core values that you've always had.

But with this comes the risk of misinterpreting this quest for individualism and independence. It's the path towards selfishness and habituation of self-serving actions that often makes our journey come to a dead end. And I definitely have approached this dead end many times.
Because when I used to think of introspection, I often neglected those around me and their opinions-- that included the closest people around me who have been by my side no matter what. I was so 'busy' in finding my purpose that when I finally came to realizations of what I wanted to do and the core fundamental motive behind that aspiration, it was to change the world, help other people and add positivity into this universe.

That's when I reached the ultimate paradox. What kind of arrogant ignorant person was I to think that reaching this grand goal would make me happy when I wasn't even practicing the fundamental motive in everyday life. In other words, it was contradicting of me to want to pursue a career that aimed to influence people's perspective of the world and 'add positive ways of thinking' to the world when I failed to practice even the basic level of empathy towards the people around me. There was something wrong here.

And gradually I began to saw the behavior of those people around me. Before, I used to think it was their problem, their personality wasn't 'friendly' enough or they were taking me for granted. Every single social interaction I had analyzed to the other person's inability to initiate or care for me (I think you can begin to see what's wrong here).
There was so much expectation. And not only that, it was ME based. Looking within myself, listening to my internal voice, I saw the selfishness of my whole viewpoint. How many times had I invited someone to hang out because I was feeling lonely and needed someone to rant to? How many times had I invited numerous people out so it would be a crowd and a good night that  could enjoy, with absolutely no care for each individual person? What did I give back to them? When had I ever given back to them?

We often hear that people can sense your aura and your motives whether you try to display them or not. Different energies will gravitate toward you depending on what kind of energy you emit. So, naturally, people that originally were my closest companions had started to drift away from me and I had blamed it on them. So I had just let it go, thinking it was just not meant to be, that I need to 'focus on myself'.

Understanding your values and beliefs is the first step to independence. But there's something so much more important that independence. And that is interdependence. This practice requires so much more discipline and self-control that independence because we often give into the most comfortable, most satisfying instantaneous action. Because it's so difficult to try to see another person's perspective or story when it does not align at all to your values. And it's so difficult to not butt into that with your own bias and truly just CARE and LISTEN. But understanding reaps far more harmony than one-ended blunt conversations. This is the key to trust and interpersonal growth.

No human lives on their own, we are all here on this earth. Regardless of whether we see the same purpose, we are going through and experiencing the laws of the universe. And I'm a strong believer that an individual is just one cell among trillions of other cells all making up the same organism. There's so much potential for growth that can happen through openness and cooperation. I may not be there yet but I'm certainly watching my thoughts to stop old habits, and soon hope I'll be in an environment of reciprocity.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

theories on brain localization

There are three major theories on how the brain is organized, in terms of its structure and function. Phrenology was proposed by Gall in the late 18th century who thought it was possible to determine character traits by examining the external bumps on the head. All behavior/mental function was assigned a location in the brain, and using more or less of these regions determined these bumps. The aggregate field view was raised by Flourens (1920s) using experimental evidence that showed that all areas are important for each mental function. So any part can perform all functions and there was no localization. Cellular connectionism (supported by Hughlings Jackson, Wernicke, Sherrington, Ramon y Cajal) states that individual neurons are signalling units that are arranged in groups, each having a particular function. References  E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz, T. Jessell, Principles of Neural Science (McGraw-Hill, New York, ed. 4, 2000).

departure

Maybe its meant to be The passing of time Seems to let us free Makes us more carefree Farewell to a friend Hoping for the best That in some other world This journey won't end But long paved roads Take hours to walk down A dragging trip Complacence is found If we can refresh The origin of our motives Healthy company In each other, we'll notice.

Is there an emotional brain? (arguments against)

The limbic system has been commonly referred to in scientific literature as the emotional brain. But we know now with more information and advanced technologies that the limbic system is an ambiguous concept, it is what LeDoux says is just a “useful anatomical shorthand”. One evidence that challenges this theory is that areas that are considered unique to mammals (therefore termed the “mammalian brain”) is also present in ‘primitive’ creatures such as reptiles and amphibians. For example, a study conducted by Gilles Laurent and colleagues in 2018 using single cell RNA-sequencing technology showed that the neurons of the pallium of reptiles had similar genetic makeup to that of the hippocampus and amygdala of mouse and humans! These areas are what MacLean included in the limbic system theory, yet they are present in these ‘lower’ animals. Moreover, the same study showed that the anterior dorsal cortex of the pallium in reptiles was similar to the human neocortex, which is a layer ...